<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging Soldier Silenced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcult.com/blogging-soldier-silenced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcult.com/blogging-soldier-silenced/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:28:01 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: JR Raphael</title>
		<link>http://www.techcult.com/blogging-soldier-silenced/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>JR Raphael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcult.com/?p=166#comment-306</guid>
		<description>@Benjamin, certainly the military has the legal ability to govern its troops&#039; public communications.  The question I raise, though, is if it&#039;s &lt;i&gt;morally&lt;/i&gt; right for them to shut down a forum such as this man&#039;s -- where there is seemingly no violation being made or security risk being posed.  

I don&#039;t think LT G, from what I&#039;ve read, ever questioned the fact that they had the power to tell him to stop posting.  But did they have a legitimate reason to exercise that power in this case?  That, to me, is the interesting question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Benjamin, certainly the military has the legal ability to govern its troops&#8217; public communications.  The question I raise, though, is if it&#8217;s <i>morally</i> right for them to shut down a forum such as this man&#8217;s &#8212; where there is seemingly no violation being made or security risk being posed.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think LT G, from what I&#8217;ve read, ever questioned the fact that they had the power to tell him to stop posting.  But did they have a legitimate reason to exercise that power in this case?  That, to me, is the interesting question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Baxter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcult.com/blogging-soldier-silenced/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Baxter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcult.com/?p=166#comment-304</guid>
		<description>Once you sign up for the military, you forfeit any and all personal freedoms. If that wasn&#039;t a requirement, you&#039;d have a rather ineffective military.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once you sign up for the military, you forfeit any and all personal freedoms. If that wasn&#8217;t a requirement, you&#8217;d have a rather ineffective military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LURKEN</title>
		<link>http://www.techcult.com/blogging-soldier-silenced/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>LURKEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 08:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcult.com/?p=166#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Another proof that Europe is SOO much better than USA...

Uncle Sam have turned into big brother Sam, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another proof that Europe is SOO much better than USA&#8230;</p>
<p>Uncle Sam have turned into big brother Sam, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

